STUDY CHALLENGES MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE SURGERY (Orthopedics This Week)
A Canadian study has found that there are no long-term beneficial outcomes between minimally invasive and open discectomies. In fact, minimally invasive surgery for discectomies may be associated with greater risks of neurologic injury and incidental damage to the covering of the spinal cord, according to a McMaster University press release.
Nathan Evaniew, a research fellow in orthopedics and a Ph.D. student in health research methodologies at McMaster University’s Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine in Hamilton, Ontario, led the study.
“Surgeons already perform open discectomies through relatively small incisions. Selecting the right patients and providing technically adequate nerve-root decompression are probably the most important determinants of long-term outcomes,” said Evaniew in the press release. “We were not surprised to find that outcomes are essentially the same between minimally invasive and open discectomies.”
The study concluded that “current evidence does not support the routine use of minimally invasive surgery to remove herniated disc material pressing on the nerve root or spinal cord in ...
