Concerns Over ‘Metal on Metal’ Hip Implants (NYTimes Health)

 

HealthPointCapital…  http://ow.ly/1n5uN

The NYT article cites a metal-on-metal revision rate of 1-3%, with women affected more frequently than men. A surgeon at Rush University who was quoted by the Times says he revises metal-on-metal hips at a rate of about “one a month.” The failure rate is largely attributed to surgeon technique, such as how implant components are aligned. This connection is not entirely new, particularly in terms of resurfacing; it has been well-documented that resurfacing is a complex procedure with a steep learning curve.

 While the Times may be among the first to bring major media attention to metal-on-metal, questions about wear debris and device failure have been circulating in the scientific and clinical community for some time. Suggestions that the revision rate is higher for resurfacing than a conventional THA have been corroborated in a recent review by the AAOS, which noted that data from three joint registries showed an increased revision rate for resurfacing. However, younger male OA patients may have a lower revision rate with resurfacing than a THA. Additionally, a poster presented at the AAOS annual meeting last year identified higher blood cobalt and chromium levels in patients with unexplained failure of metal-on-metal hips.

NYTimes..  http://ow.ly/1e6pV

Some of the nation’s leading orthopedic surgeons have reduced or stopped use of a popular category of artificial hips amid concerns that the devices are causing severe tissue and bone damage in some patients, often requiring replacement surgery within a year or two.

Quoted are…  Dr. Young-Min Kwon (MGH), Dr. Joshua J. Jacobs (Rush), Dr. Daniel J. Berry (Mayo), Dr. Harlan C. Amstutz (LA), Dr. Brett Levine (Rush)

Uncategorized